How a unified learning management system reduces technical debt and maximises learning impact

How a unified learning management system reduces technical debt and maximises learning impact marquee image

Delivering effective learning experiences is crucial for organisations to develop their workforce and drive business success. Despite increased investment in learning and development (L&D) initiatives, many organisations are struggling to align their learning strategies with business priorities and deliver impactful learning programmes.

According to a recent CIPD survey, the alignment of learning strategies with organisational and people priorities has experienced a decline from 77% to 67% over the past two years. This misalignment has far-reaching consequences, affecting not only leadership but also the learners themselves. In fact, 41% of learners reported that their working environments were not conducive to learning.

This disconnect between investment and impact suggests that simply increasing L&D spending is not enough. To maximise the effectiveness of learning initiatives, organisations must ensure that their learning platforms, solutions and apps work together seamlessly. When these components are disconnected, it can negatively affect the learning experience and hinder the success of L&D efforts.

Debt and dysfunction — the impact of ineffective learning management systems (LMSs)

Leaders of learning departments aim to deliver the best possible experiences and opportunities for their employees, contractors, customers and partners. This involves ensuring that learning programmes are cohesive. And, by extension, your technology strategy and implementation should be unified and seamless. When aligned, you get learning programmes that cater to diverse learning styles, individual preferences and the needs of your organisation.

However, the enthusiasm to try new avenues for learning could counterproductively complicate and ultimately work against the goals of these initiatives. Here’s how this situation grows dissonant over time.

How LMS complexity contributes to technical debt

While its conceptual origins lie in software development, technical debt in the context of business operations refers to the future costs and consequences organisations incur when prioritising short-term technical solutions. On average, 20% of resources earmarked for technical innovation get rerouted to mitigate the toll technical debt takes.

In 2023, more than 86% of organisations reported dealing with the challenges of technical debt due to their multitude of platforms.

LMS complexity contributes to technical debt image Learning and development initiatives are by no means the only contributing factor to technical debt within an organisation. But when not strategically aligned or managed, learning solutions and programmes can influence technical debt significantly.

Increased complexity and costs

Every application, piece of software and platform drafted into the learning ecosystem increases the complexity of an organisation’s technical infrastructure. This complexity translates into higher costs related to maintenance, integration and support.

Learning programs that begin to spiral start pulling resources away from core functions. Left unchecked, the resources needed to keep learning programmes afloat can affect an organisation’s ability to invest in new initiatives and innovations.

Integration challenges

Within organisations, integrating data, workflows and user experiences across multiple platforms can foster an unhealthy reliance on customised solutions, middleware or the extensive use of API integrations. When correctly implemented, they help increase the effectiveness of the LMS. But, when deployed incorrectly, integrations can be fragile, difficult to maintain and costly to update.

Scalability issues

A highly fragmented LMS landscape can hinder an organisation’s ability to scale. As your business grows, scaling or adapting overly complex learning initiatives requires extra resources and time. This can limit your organisational agility, hampering your ability to respond to emergent needs or opportunities.

Security and compliance risks

With multiple solutions in use, ensuring data security and compliance with relevant regulations — including the GDPR in Europe or HIPAA for healthcare businesses — becomes increasingly challenging. Each platform, software system and application may have its own security model, requiring individualised attention to avoid data breaches or non-compliance.

Lack of strategy in learning can tune out learners

Successful learning initiatives at the enterprise level should help foster a culture of engagement, one in which continuous learning is emphasised. However, when these initiatives are mismanaged or strategically misaligned, these initiatives can actively work against the very causes it seeks to improve.

Decreased engagement and motivation

Complex and disjointed learning experiences frustrate learning participants. The need to navigate multiple platforms and apps, remember different log in credentials and familiarise oneself with inconsistent user interfaces can deter your learners from valuable learning content.

Inconsistent learning experiences

Information and courses scattered across multiple locations can expose learners to inconsistencies in content quality, assessment methods and instructional design. These inconsistencies can lead to gaps in your learners’ knowledge, skills and competencies while diluting the efficacy of your learning initiatives and reduce the LMS return on investment.

Challenges with progress and performance tracking

The ability to track learning progress and outcomes is a key motivator for adult learners. For this reason, when learning initiatives are unnecessarily fragmented, tracking ongoing participation becomes cumbersome. Such challenges can also hinder your ability to keep tabs on engagement, completion rates and the results of your learning interventions.

Barriers to personalised learning

Ultimately, the promise of personalised learning experiences becomes nearly impossible in a fragmented LMS landscape. When you don’t have access to learning data and insights across solutions, you struggle to tailor learning paths and content to meet individual needs and address performance gaps.

How do you reduce technical debt and deliver a unified learning management system with positive ROI?

Choosing a best-in-class LMS like Adobe Learning Manager can play a major role in reducing your technical debt, improving learner engagement and maximising your learning ROI.

The right LMS reduces technical debt and maximises impact

Key benefits of a unified LMS for maximising your learning impact

A unified LMS that lets you train all employees, customers and partners offers several benefits for your learners and the business overall.

Learn more about Adobe Learning Manager

To understand how enterprises use an LMS to drive learning ROI, read about Publicis Media and their experience with Adobe Learning Manager.

Shobhana Menon is a marketing manager for Adobe Learning Manager. She creates well researched and actionable content that helps organisations optimise their learning initiatives. Her key focus lies in exploring creative and innovative strategies that help spark learner enthusiasm.

As the Community Manager for the Adobe eLearning Community, Shobhana actively networks with learning experts and thought leaders to share their insights at Adobe’s flagship events and webinars for learning professionals.

https://business.adobe.com/fragments/resources/cards/thank-you-collections/learning-manager