A work breakdown structure (WBS) is a planning tool designed to break down everything required to complete a project. When faced with a large project, it can be difficult to know where to begin. A WBS addresses this by dividing one large task into smaller, more manageable ones, making it easier to determine what to tackle first. An effective work breakdown structure should include the following:
- Deliverables: These represent the outcomes your work is designed to achieve. A project may have a single final deliverable or several goals to work towards. Regardless of the project’s scale, defining your deliverables at the outset is always advisable.
- Tasks: These are the actions required to deliver your outcomes. A WBS helps you identify and define these tasks, each tailored to your specific project. They may range from work you handle directly to responsibilities you delegate to others.
- Subtasks: Many tasks will be too large to manage in isolation and will need to be broken down further into subtasks. In principle, subtasks can be divided into progressively smaller components, though a natural point will arise beyond which further division serves no practical purpose.
In essence, a WBS enables you to build a flowchart that converts all deliverables into manageable tasks, providing your team with a clear guide for developing or completing a project.
A key aspect of any WBS is the interplay between structure, project scope, schedule and budget. All four influence one another and determine what is and isn’t achievable. For example, a tight two-week schedule will limit the scope – but it may help reduce the overall budget. Conversely, a generous budget might allow you to bring in additional staff, enabling you to expand the scope or complete more tasks within the same timeframe.
The 100% rule is a further principle to consider. It stipulates that the work breakdown structure must account for 100% of the project’s scope and all its deliverables. In other words, nothing should sit outside the WBS – every aspect of the project must be captured, no matter how minor it may appear.
Deliverable-based vs. phase-based WBS: Choosing the right approach
There are two distinct approaches to creating a WBS – deliverable-based, which focuses on individual tasks or parts of the project scope, or phase-based, which breaks down projects by timeline.
Deliverable-based
Deliverable-based approaches are the most common in project management. They create a visualisation of the relationship between the project’s deliverables and the overall scope of work. This approach helps to break down tasks into their component subtasks.
Advantages:
- Focused on outcomes. The structure centres on end products, making progress easier to track.
- Simplified risk management. Potential risks are easier to identify, as each is linked to a specific deliverable.
Disadvantages:
- Potential for scope creep. Where deliverables are not clearly defined, additional work can be incorporated and contribute to scope creep – where deliverables expand beyond the original plan and budget.
- Overemphasis on deliverables. Focusing solely on deliverables makes it easy to overlook important details within the surrounding processes.
Phase-based
Phase-based approaches typically follow five core stages: initiation, planning, execution, control and closeout. Once these phases are defined, the project team works together to sort and assign tasks to the appropriate phase.