While B2B organizations are eager to benefit from agentic AI’s transformative capabilities, many struggle to scale the technology due to key issues surrounding data infrastructure, talent development, and the ability to assess AI’s value. These barriers form an interconnected web: without reliable data, AI models underperform; without skilled teams, organizations cannot deploy or refine those models; and without robust evaluation frameworks, leadership lacks the evidence to sustain investment.
Three-quarters of B2B organizations cite data integration and quality as their biggest struggle in implementing agentic AI, ranking it above every other challenge. The underlying problem is structural: only 41% say they have the unified customer data foundation needed to extract insights from all the data created by their AI agents and conversational interfaces.
Fewer than half (48%) say their organization’s current data quality and accessibility is adequate for AI, and over half (54%) admit that their ability to advance AI initiatives is limited by their current level of data unification and structure. These infrastructure gaps are compounded for more than a third (36%) of B2B brands, who say legacy systems and vendor lock-in create technology infrastructure challenges that further constrain their data environments.
In response, interoperability is emerging as a priority in the vendor selection process. Over half of B2B organizations (55%) view agent-to-agent interoperability as crucial when deciding on AI solutions, signaling that organizations recognize siloed tools will only deepen their data fragmentation.
Nearly three-quarters (72%) say they struggle with talent and skills gaps when implementing agentic AI solutions. The expectation placed on employees is high: over half of B2B organizations (58%) say their employees should now consider AI an indispensable coworker, not just a tool. This suggests brands are looking to AI as a force multiplier, particularly on constrained teams. Yet fewer than half (48%) characterize their employees as “comfortable” using AI in their roles, a gap between what organizations demand of their workforce and what that workforce is currently equipped or willing to deliver. Further complicating the issue: while 58% say their organization is committed to providing the skills training required for employees to become proficient in using AI tools, just 49% believe they have sufficient AI training and upskilling programs in place.
Evaluating returns from agentic AI investments proves difficult for B2B organizations: 71% rank unclear ROI or business cases as a key implementation barrier. Over half (57%) struggle to demonstrate measurable returns using CX-related metrics on any of their AI investments, agentic or otherwise. A contributing factor may be how success is defined at the top. Over half (52%) say their organization’s leadership prioritizes purely financial metrics when assessing AI initiatives, a narrower lens than the broader operational, experiential, and strategic value AI can deliver.
The assessment gap is particularly acute for newer technologies. Only 39% of B2B brands have developed measurement frameworks for evaluating the value and ROI of their generative AI technologies, and even fewer (30%) have these frameworks in place for agentic AI. As many as half (51%) say their organization has neither framework in place or are unsure (Figure 2).